Kandi Burruss' estranged husband Todd Tucker might have a fighting chance at winning his prenuptial argument in their ongoing divorce - but it'll be tricky, legal experts warn. "Any time a person signs a prenuptial agreement days or hours before their wedding, they are creating an argument to be made later that they were under duress or undue pressure to sign the document," Holly Davis, founding partner of Kirker Davis LLP, who is not connected to the former couple's divorce case, exclusively tells Us Weekly. She noted that this legal argument "only holds weight" if Tucker can prove his argument meets certain factors. While she believes Tucker, 52, had "ample time and opportunity" to call his attorney before signing the prenup ahead of their 2014 wedding, Davis said, "In the rare chance that Kandi's lawyer fraudulently asserted that Todd's attorney had signed off on the terms of the prenup when they had not, it might have a chance to win." Kandi Burruss Details Being 'Emotionally Broken' Amid Todd Tucker Divorce However, in her opinion, "The fact that Todd had an attorney on retainer and had been discussing the prenuptial agreement with him for months preceding the wedding makes his argument a losing one." Atty K. Bruggemann, partner at Gallet Dreyer & Berkey LLP, who has not worked with the estranged couple, agrees, telling Us it could come down to the unaired Bravo footage that Burruss, 49, is using in their divorce battle. "Because Georgia requires full financial disclosure, voluntariness, and the absence of coercion, Todd would need to show that one of these elements was missing when he signed," she says. "This is where the wedding-related footage becomes significant: if the footage depicts Kandi or her family exerting undue pressure, setting last-minute deadlines, or presenting the prenup under emotionally charged circumstances Todd's argument could be persuasive." The attorney also says that footage from The Real Housewives of Atlanta and five-part reality television wedding documentary, Kandi's Wedding, could help Tucker. Kandi Burruss and Todd Tucker. Manny Carabel/Getty Images "Similarly, if the footage or other evidence suggests he did not fully understand the financial terms, did not have a realistic opportunity to consult independent counsel, or was rushed into signing without negotiation, Georgia courts may view those factors as weakening the agreement's enforceability," she adds. "The #1 issue Todd would have to prove to challenge the prenup is involuntariness - that he was pressured, threatened, or coerced into signing coupled with the lack of time to negotiate, consult with counsel and understand the draft he ultimately signed." She continues, "The particularly interesting part of this issue is what the raw footage captured, what producers can testify to, and if there was any dramatic effect put into the edited footage that can be contradicted by witnesses to show that any panic, coercion, or intensity in that moment was inserted for dramatic effect and that all was settled prior to Todd's signing." Yonatan S. Levoritz, a New York-based divorce attorney who specializes in high-conflict, high-asset custody disputes and prenup litigation, tells Us that Tucker's prenup claim "may have some validity as the lack of counsel is but one factor for the court to consider." "While having counsel is an important right it is not the be all and end all of the argument. The agreement would have to be one-sided in favor Kandi in terms of the rights or deprivation of rights under the agreement. Therefore, if the agreement was lopsided and deprived Todd of significant marital wealth and he was unaware of the terms and Kandi had counsel present that could be enough to increase his odds at overturning the agreement," Levortiz, who is not involved in their divorce case, says. RHOA's Kandi Burruss' Ex Todd Demands Primary Custody, Questions Prenup Burruss filed for divorce from Tucker on November 21. As Us first reported, while Tucker acknowledged he was given the prenup before their April 2014 wedding, he claims his lawyer was not present when he was given with the final draft. The former RHOA star brushed off those claims, alleging that Tucker "audibly announced" that he was "good to sign" the prenup during a private encounter with her and after talking to his lawyer "on and off camera." Besides the prenup, Burruss and Tucker are also fighting over custody of their two children: son Ace, 9, and daughter Blaze, 6. (Burrus is also mom to daughter Riley, 23, from a previous relationship.) He is demanding primary custody of Ace and Blaze, claiming his ex's work schedule will require her to be away from the kids for several months. Burruss, who had initially asked for joint custody, later changed her request to sole custody. She argued that each of their careers have required them "to travel away from the home for extended period of times, independently and jointly, prior to and after the births of both of the minor