The most fringe elements of Donald Trump's cultish fan club have already moved on to the next stage of their Jeffrey Epstein grief: acceptance. The President and his handpicked, ultra-loyal DOJ and FBI leaders made clear this month that they were NEVER going to release the Epstein files. In fact, Trump himself told everyone to stop talking about his old pal Epstein - and said he didn't want the support of MAGA who still wanted the truth about it. Plenty of his fans clearly think participation in underage sex trafficking is worse than shooting someone on 5th Avenue, because they are NOT letting it go. And his sus behavior about it has already lost him plenty of supporters. But as always, quite a few fell in line. One of Trump's loudest defenders, Azealia Banks, isn't afraid to jump to the next logical step of Trump support: defending sex with underage girls. Related: Trump Is About To Pardon Ghislaine Maxwell... In Return For Her Saying..? At this point it's hard to hold on to any faith that Trump didn't have anything to do with Epstein's victimization of young girls. After all, when you look at it all together - Trump saying Jeff "likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side," the stories about them partying with young models together, Trump riding on the "Lolita Express" multiple times, Trump promoting the attorneys who protected Epstein... and now telling everyone to shut up about it? It sure looks like he's guilty. Azealia agrees, apparently. And she's defending him anyway! On Saturday she began a wild rant in which she seemingly took the position that she believed the worst about Trump - perhaps even the harrowing resurfaced accusations that he raped a 13-year-old named Katie Johnson - but didn't think we should be upset about it?? She tweeted: "Ok in Donald Trumps defense - f**king 14 year old girls was really only made a social taboo in the 1990's." Sorry, WHAT?!? Look, we know the history of society's view on young women and their ability to consent (or anyone caring whether they do) is horrible. But this is wildly revisionist history. We were alive in the '90s, and it was NOT totally chill for grown men to be having sex with 14-year-olds back then. That's wild. It's upsetting how long it took for the legal age of consent to be raised in some places, but the common view was much more progressive. Hell, that book Lolita - about the professor hooking up with the 12-year-old girl? - that came out in the '50s, and it was a scandal then. Most publishers refused to touch it based on the subject matter. So yes, this was "taboo" long before the '90s. Anyway, she went on to write: "My grandmother was born in 1927 and had her first child when she was 12. Teenage pregnancy only become frowned upon with the rise of Jerry Springer and I also can be honest about the fact that I was old enough to choose, seduce and decide to f**k grown ass men when I was 15. I really don't get why women are fronting like they weren't f**king 40 year olds at 15 like come on now." That is... an argument. We think Azealia might be surprised how most other women would react to that statement - maybe in a way she's not ready to hear. But the most illuminating statement in the whole wild post? She says not only does she believe Trump was involved in having sex with underage girls, she's "not surprised." Well, on that at least we can agree, considering all the man's public statements about young girls, about pageant contestants, about his own daughter. The big difference? Azealia isn't "mad at Trump" about it. WHAT?! "I'm honestly not surprised or mad at Trump for getting some 15-year-old p***y because those were the times." "Those were the times"? JFC. First off, no those were not the times. Hell, even by her own logic! These allegations are about events that happened in the '90s and early 2000s. What a horrifying thing to say! She ended with: "Goodnight USA for f**king ever. Now... if he was f**king a TEN YEAR OLD???? ... We have a problem. But if the girls were 13+, - who cares move on" "Who cares move on"... In the very worst allegation ever made against Donald Trump, the girls were 13. So we have to assume she's referencing Katie Johnson when she says this. And her response to that story is "who cares move on"?? Katie said he tied her to a bed at Epstein's place and forcibly raped her. It's one thing to not believe that happened. It's another to accept that Trump and Epstein were having sex with 13-year-olds and to just shrug your shoulders. Innerestingly she deleted that tweet. But didn't apologize or anything. She kept fighting with commenters, like one who reasonably read from her post: "To be fair, you're the one who's said you think trump did have sex with children but that it's OK because it was the 90s." Azealia clarified: "No, I didn't say it was OKAY. I said - I'm not about to exhaust myself over some s**t one man did in the 90's when SOCIETY DEEMED IT SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE." Again, it was NOT socially a